ARTICLE
11 November 2026

The Current Status and Group Differences of College Students’ Patriotic Attitude in the New Era: An Empirical Analysis Based on 1,631 College Students

Jinmei He1*
Show Less
1 School of Marxism, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, China
IEF 2026 , 4(10), 225–239; https://doi.org/10.26689/IEF.v4i10.16117
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Precise implementation of patriotic education requires a clear grasp of the actual condition of the educatees. The promulgation and enforcement of the Patriotic Education Law of the People’s Republic of China has transformed patriotic education from an advocacy-based requirement into a legally binding norm. Based on a questionnaire survey of 1,862 college students, this study retained 1,631 valid responses (87.6% of the original sample) after excluding cases completed in fewer than sixty seconds and those displaying uniform straight-lining. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, t-tests, and analysis of variance, supplemented by effect-size estimates, were applied to a four-dimensional model of patriotic attitude comprising cognitive, affective, behavioral, and value dimensions. Three findings emerge. First, students’ patriotic attitude is generally high (M = 4.786; scoring rate = 95.73%), yet the four dimensions develop unevenly, with affect taking the lead (99.07%) and value lagging behind (92.36%). Second, differences across gender, year of study, and subject track are limited, with homogeneity outweighing heterogeneity; all statistically significant differences are of small effect size, and both affect and behavior decline as students advance through the university, with a comparable gap persisting only between the first-year and third-year cohorts. Third, value correlates only weakly to moderately with the other three dimensions (r = 0.147–0.284), markedly below the intercorrelations among cognition, affect and behavior (r = 0.419–0.600), indicating that rational stance and affective identification do not develop in step; the weakest items cluster in cognitive discrimination and value tolerance. These findings suggest that patriotic education should shift its center of gravity from affective arousal toward rational consciousness, differentiate its provision in response to the limited group differences that do exist, and address the two structural deficits in conceptual discrimination and value tolerance.

Keywords
College students
Patriotic attitude
Four-dimensional structure
Group differences
Empirical study
Funding
This work is a partial outcome of the Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences Fund Project “Evaluation Research on Generative AI-Enabled Patriotism Education for Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Institutions” (AHSKYY2025D05), of the Anhui Provincial Department of Education Quality Engineering Project “Integrated Research on Patriotism Education in Ideological and Political Courses across Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Institutions” (2024jyxm0222), and of the stage project of the “Ideological and Moral Cultivation and the Rule of Law” course (2025aijy163),and of the stage project of the University Quality Engineering Project: "AI+Education" Course for Ideology, Morality and the Rule of Law (acaikc2025010).
References

[1] CPC Central Committee and State Council, 2019, Outline for the Implementation of Patriotic Education in the New Era.

[2] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 2023, Patriotic Education Law of the People’s Republic of China.

[3] Liu J, 2019, A Theoretical Interpretation of the Cultivation of Deep Patriotic Feeling. Thought and Political Education, 2019(9): 12–16.

[4] Luo Y, Wang Y, 2021, On the Stance of Patriotism. Marxism and Reality, 2021(2): 188–194.

[5] Li Q, 2017, Effective Pathways for the Patriotic Education of College Students under the New Situation. Guide to Ideological and Political Education, 2017(4): 143–147.

[6] Hu H, 2021, A Multidimensional Analysis of Patriotic Education in the New Era from a Systems-Theory Perspective. Thought and Political Education, 2021(2): 55–60.

[7] Conover PJ, Feldman S, 1987, Measuring Patriotism and Nationalism. Paper Presented to the NES Board of Overseers.

[8] Bar-Tal D, 1993, Patriotism as Fundamental Beliefs of Group Members. Politics and the Individual, 3(2): 45–62.

[9] Huddy L, Khatib N, 2007, American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77.

[10] Schatz RT, Staub E, Lavine H, 1999, On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind Versus Constructive Patriotism. Political Psychology, 20(1): 151–174.

[11] Kosterman R, Feshbach S, 1989, Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2): 257–274.

[12] Zou J, Xiao T, 2022, Affect, Value and Behavior: Three Facets of Patriotic Attitude and the Development of a Scale. Nanjing Social Sciences, 2022(4): 61–75.

[13] Cui J, 2014, Turning and Reconstruction: The Trajectory of Change in Young People’s Patriotic Consciousness since the 1980s. Southwest University Journal of Social Sciences, 2014(2): 50–54.

[14] Wen J, Zhang J, 2022, Peer Guidance in Youth Patriotic Education: The Case of Demobilised College Student Soldiers. School Party Building and Ideological Education, 2022(19): 22–25.

[15] Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale,

[16] Pan C, 2019, The Main Position of Youth Patriotic Education Must Be Well Built in the New Era. Ideological Education Research, 2019(12): 42–45.

[17] Fornell, C, Larcker DF, 1981, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

Share
Back to top