ARTICLE
11 November 2026

From Generic Frameworks to Measurable Standards: School-Enterprise Collaborative Construction of Training Standards and a Post-Oriented Curriculum System for Field Engineers in Automotive Lamp Intelligent Manufacturing

Feng Lin1 ,  Siyu Liu1 ,  Qingfeng 1*
Show Less
1 Changzhou University of Information Technology, School of Cyberspace Security, Changzhou, 213164, Jiangsu, China
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Field engineers are a key talent group for the intelligent transformation of manufacturing, yet their cultivation still suffers from generalized standards, curriculum-post disconnection, superficial work-based delivery, and unbalanced evaluation. Drawing on competence-based education, situated and workplace learning, the skill-acquisition model, and outcome-based education, this paper reports a school-enterprise reform in a jointly cultivated field-engineer Program in automotive lamp intelligent manufacturing. A three-step procedure of investigation, task decomposition, and expert review produced a post-competence map covering five post clusters and a three-dimensional measurable standard (disposition, knowledge, ability) with five technology indicators described at five progressive levels with evidence requirements. Guided by the standard, a four-tier progressive curriculum was rebuilt through the conversion path of typical work tasks, learning fields, and learning situations across four stages, supported by a six-joint mechanism with dual mentors and verified by a tripartite evaluation system. Pilot results show 100 percent post matching and enterprise satisfaction above 95 percent, offering a replicable paradigm for subdivided manufacturing sectors.

Keywords
Field engineer
School-enterprise collaboration
Training standard
Post-oriented curriculum
Competence map
Vocational education
Funding
2026 Changzhou University of Information Vocational and Technical Education Reform Project (Project No.2026CXJG16)
References

[1] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, et al., 2022, Notice on Implementing the Special Training Program for Field Engineers in Vocational Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/s7055/202211/t20221104_932353.html

[2] International Engineering Alliance, 2021, Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies. https://www.ieagreements.org/

[3] Yu YL, Kuang Y, 2024, Field Engineers in an International Comparative Perspective. Higher Engineering Education Research, 2024(5): 127–132.

[4] Deissinger T, 2019, The Sustainability of the Dual System Approach to VET, in The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training. Wiley, Hoboken, 293–310.

[5] Fuller A, Unwin L, 2011, Apprenticeship as an Evolving Model of Learning. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3): 261–266.

[6] Wang YN, Cheng J, Shao JD, 2023, Role Positioning, Core Competence and Cultivation Path of Field Engineers from the Perspective of Technology Industrialization. China Higher Education Research, 2023(9): 95–101.

[7] Huo LJ, 2023, The Connotation, Element Framework and Operation Logic of the Special Training Program for Field Engineers. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2023(14): 5–11.

[8] Yao LX, 2024, How Are Field Engineers in Vocational Education Made: A Case Study of College-Enterprise Collaborative Cultivation. Vocational and Technical Education, 2024(2): 13–18.

[9] Xu L, Mei YH, Wang ZM, 2024, Realistic Dilemmas and Path Optimisation of Field-Engineer Cultivation under New Application Scenarios of Intelligent Manufacturing. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2024(14): 13–21.

[10] Chi CY, Xu YC, Liu HM, 2024, Workplace Learning: Cultivating Field Engineers for Digital and Intelligent Vocational Scenarios. Higher Engineering Education Research, 2024(4): 129–133.

[11] Eraut M, 2004, Informal Learning in the Workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2): 247–273.

[12] Mulder M, 2017, Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education: Bridging the Worlds of Work and Education. Springer, Cham.

[13] Lave J, Wenger E, 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[14] Billett S, 2001, Learning in the Workplace: Strategies for Effective Practice. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.

[15] Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE, 1986, Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press, New York.

[16] Spady WG, 1994, Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington.

[17] Pan HS, Tang J, 2023, Constructing the Standard System of Vocational Education under High-Quality Development. Higher Engineering Education Research, 2023(6): 138–143 + 151.

[18] Qin J, Zhu ZJ, 2024, The Connotation, Logic and Path of Building Dual-Mentor Teams for Field-Engineer Cultivation in Vocational Education. Education and Vocation, 2024(14): 43–49.

[19] Sun CX, Bi DQ, 2019, Dilemmas and Breakthroughs of Enterprise Participation in Modern Apprenticeship Pilots: An Analysis of 17 Pilot Enterprises. Vocational and Technical Education Forum, 2019(3): 31–39.

[20] Liu YC, Lu BL, 2024, The Cooperation Mechanism and Optimisation Path of Field-Engineer Cultivation from the Perspective of Co-production. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2024(3): 28–35.

Share
Back to top