Volume 8,Issue 9
Critical Thinking Disposition and English Argumentative Writing Self-Efficacy Among Chinese Undergraduates: The Role of Prior Generative AI Use Experience
This cross-sectional study examined associations among critical thinking disposition (CTD), English argumentative writing self-efficacy (WSE), and prior generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use frequency among 149 Chinese undergraduate freshmen. Participants completed a theory-guided 40-item abbreviated CTD measure and a researcher-developed English argumentative WSE questionnaire. The total CTD scale and the 11-item WSE composite demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .916 and .952, respectively). The primary outcome was an 11-item WSE composite that excluded a future-oriented item with limited conceptual fit to task-specific efficacy. Total CTD was moderately and positively correlated with WSE, r = .394, p < .001. In a hierarchical multiple regression analysis, gender and Gaokao English score category accounted for 3.9% of the variance in WSE. Adding prior GenAI use frequency did not significantly improve model fit, ΔR² = .002, F change(1, 145) = 0.279, p = .598. Adding total CTD significantly improved model fit, ΔR² = .150, F change(1, 144) = 26.616, p < .001, and the final model explained 19.1% of the variance in WSE. After adjustment for gender, Gaokao English score category, and prior GenAI use frequency, total CTD was a significant positive correlate of WSE, B = .701, SE = .136, β = .388, p < .001. In an exploratory model simultaneously including the four CTD dimensions, critical thinking self-confidence was the only significant unique CTD correlate of WSE. These findings indicate that Chinese undergraduate freshmen reporting stronger CTD also tended to report greater perceived capability for English argumentative writing. Because the study was cross-sectional and relied on self-report measures, causal conclusions are not warranted.
[1] Bandura A, 1997, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Worth Publishers.
[2] Pajares F, 2003, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Motivation, and Achievement in Writing: A Review of the Literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2): 139–58.
[3] Pajares M, Johnson MJ, 1993, Confidence and Competence in Writing: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectancy, and Apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28.
[4] Zimmerman BJ, Bandura A, 1994, Impact of Self-Regulatory Influences on Writing Course Attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4): 845–62.
[5] Pajares F, Miller MD, 1995, Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematics Performances: The Need for Specificity of Assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42: 190–8.
[6] An H, Li S, 2024, Task-Specific Writing Anxiety and Self-Efficacy Are Separate from General L2 Writing Anxiety and Self-Efficacy and They Have Differential Associations with the Effects of Written Corrective Feedback in Pre-Task and Within-Task Planning. System, 126: 103480.
[7] Ye W, Xu Y, 2024, Modeling Writing Self-Efficacy over Time and across Tasks in an EFL Context. System, 121: 103242.
[8] Facione P, 1989, Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations, 315.
[9] Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CA, 1994, Critical Thinking Disposition as a Measure of Competent Clinical Judgment: The Development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. The Journal of Nursing Education, 33(8): 345–50.
[10] Pei Z, Zheng C, Meng Z, et al., 2017, Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China. English Language Teaching, 10: 31–.
[11] Chunxia L, 2021, Infusing Critical Thinking Skills into Argumentative Writing: A Study of Chinese College English Learners. English Language and Literature Studies, 11: 8–.
[12] Qi H, Lin Abdullah Kamal SS, Lahlou H, 2025, Impact of Flipped Classroom on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Chinese EFL Undergraduates’ Argumentative Essays: A Pilot Study. Arab World English Journal.
[13] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, et al., 2023, ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103: 102274.
[14] Kohnke L, Moorhouse BL, Zou D, 2023, ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2): 537–50.
[15] Yang Y, Hussin S, Hashim H, 2025, Revising with Intelligence: ChatGPT Feedback and Its Impact on EFL Students’ Revision and Self-Efficacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7.
[16] Huang J, Mizumoto A, 2024, Examining the Effect of Generative AI on Students’ Motivation and Writing Self-Efficacy. Digital Applied Linguistics, 1: 102324.
[17] Teng MF, 2024, “ChatGPT Is the Companion, Not Enemies”: EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Experiences in Using ChatGPT for Feedback in Writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7: 100270.
[18] Bouzar A, El Idrissi K, Ghourdou T, 2024, ChatGPT and Academic Writing Self-Efficacy: Unveiling Correlations and Technological Dependency among Postgraduate Students. Arab World English Journal, 1: 225–36.
[19] Tusino T, Dewi P, Hati M, et al., 2025, ChatGPT in Academic Writing Classes: Exploring EFL Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13: 2162–72.
[20] Werdiningsih I, Marzuki, Indrawati I, et al., 2024, Revolutionizing EFL Writing: Unveiling the Strategic Use of ChatGPT by Indonesian Master’s Students. Cogent Education, 11.
[21] Cotton DRE, Cotton PA, Shipway JR, 2024, Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2): 228–39.
[22] Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, et al., 2023, What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1): 15.
[23] Yeh ML, 2002, Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(2): 123–32.
