ARTICLE
27 October 2026

Paradigm Reconstruction and Practical Pathways of AI-Enabled Physical Chemistry Teaching

Xiaomei Ning1 ,  Xiaosong Zhou1 ,  Jin Luo1 ,  Liang Zhan1*
Show Less
1 Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China
erd 2026 , 8(9), 264–270; https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v8i9.16005
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Physical chemistry is a core course for chemistry‑related majors. Its teaching faces problems such as abstract concepts, complicated mathematical deductions, and disconnection between theory and practice, making it difficult to improve teaching quality. Generative artificial intelligence offers new solutions to these teaching difficulties. This paper proposes strategies to reduce cognitive barriers, reshape classroom models, and optimize evaluations. Besides, it also puts forward risk prevention measures for “cognitive outsourcing” and “AI hallucinations”. This research holds that the essence of AI-enabled physical chemistry teaching lies in realizing the paradigm shift from unified content supply to the construction of an educational ecosystem through technology, and its effectiveness depends on consistently prioritizing the cultivation of students’ higher‑order thinking abilities.

Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Physical chemistry
Human‑AI collaboration
Teaching reform
Funding
Guangdong Provincial Undergraduate University Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project for 2024 (Yue Jiao Gao Han [2024] No. 30); Lingnan Normal University Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project for 2024 (Ling Shi Jiao Wu [2024] No. 112)
References

[1]   Zhang J, Kuang X, Liu Y, 2025, Teaching Reform and Innovation of Physical Chemistry Course under the Background of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Modern Educational Theory and Practice, 2(3): 601.

[2]   Yuriev E, Orgill M, Holme T, 2025, Generative AI in Chemistry Education: Current Progress, Pedagogical Values, and the Challenge of Rapid Evolution. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(9): 3773–3776.

[3]   Yuriev E, Wink DJ, Holme TA, 2024, The Dawn of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(8): 2957–2959.

[4]   Liu H, 2025, Reform and Practical Study of Teaching Mode in Physical Chemistry Empowered by Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Natural Science Education, 2(3): 31–43.

[5]   Cheng Y, Zhao D, Zhang Z, 2025, Practical Exploration of AI-Enabled Rain Classroom in Blended Teaching of Physical Chemistry. University Chemistry, 40(9): 196–205.

[6]   Liang J, Wang L, Luo J, et al., 2023, The Relationship between Student Interaction with Generative Artificial Intelligence and Learning Achievement: Serial Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1285392.

[7]   Fu H, Jiang Y, 2026, AI-Empowered Undergraduate Chemistry Learning: Cognitive Reconstruction from Knowledge Acquisition to Competence Generation. University Chemistry, 2604032.

[8]   Wu L, Lei S, 2025, Generative AI-Driven Innovative Chemistry Teaching: Current Status and Future Prospects. University Chemistry, 40(9): 206–219.

[9]   Yuan R, Zhang L, Xu X, et al., 2025, Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Physical Chemistry Teaching. University Chemistry, 40(9): 238–244.

[10] Radif M, 2024, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transforming Learning Environments and Enhancing Student Engagement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 24(1): 93–103.

[11] Yaseen H, Mohammad AS, Ashal N, 2025, The Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies, Personalized Feedback, and Interactive AI Tools on Student Engagement: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy. Sustainability, 17(3): 1133.

[12] Haraldsrud A, Odden TOB, 2025, Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Real Intelligence: Self-Scaffolding Computational Modeling with Generative AI in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(10): 4255–4266.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top