ARTICLE
26 April 2026

Iconicity in Yuan Kejia’s English Translations of Xu Zhimo’s Modern Chinese Poetry: A CSAT Perspective

Qin Li1* ,  Chenggong Zhou2
Show Less
1 School of Foreign Languages, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, China
2 School of Foreign Languages, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, China
TPCCC 2026 , 1(2), 87–93; https://doi.org/10.26689/TPCCC.v1i2.15846
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

From the perspective of cognitive stylistics in translation studies, this study explores the iconicity in the English versions of Xu Zhimo’s poems Farewell to Cambridge and The Snow translated by Yuan Kejia. Iconicity is defined as the perceptible correspondence between the linguistic form and the action, experience or cognitive process depicted in the text. This study examines quantitative, sequential, and marked iconicity, focusing on how repetition, parallel structures, word order, line breaks, phonological patterning, semantic incongruity, and identity transformation contribute to meaning construction. The results show that Yuan Kejia’s translations preserve substantial formal correspondence, particularly in lexical repetition, parallel structures, and the overall progression of action. Nevertheless, lexical substitution and syntactic reconstruction often change or weaken the effect of interpretation. In some cases, local phonological and rhythmic features partially compensate for these losses. This study argues that poetry translation should not only consider semantic content, but also take into account the inference function of stylistic form, and explains how translation can retain, reconstruct or weaken the relationship between form and meaning.

Keywords
Cognitive stylistics
Iconicity
Xu Zhimo
Yuan Kejia
Poetry translation
Funding
Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Science Research Fund (Project No.: 2026Y0259); Practical Innovation Project of Postgraduate Students in the Professional Degree of Yunnan University (Project No.: ZC-252511908)
References

[1] Boase-Beier J, 2020, Translation and Style, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York.

[2] Okonski L, 2021, Scientists, Poets and Iconic Realities: A Cognitive Theory of Aesthetics. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(3): 141–145.

[3] Young J, 2023, Why Poetry?: Semiotic Scaffolding & the Poetic Architecture of Cognition. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(2): 198–212.

[4] Yuan Y, Tu G, 2022, An Empirical Study on Imagery and Emotional Response in Chinese Poetry Translation—The Visual Grammar Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

[5] Xu ZM, 2022, Farewell to Cambridge and The Snow. In: Payne R, ed., Contemporary Chinese Poetry, Routledge, New York, 37 + 40–41.

[6] Boase-Beier J, 2006, Stylistic Approaches to Translation, Routledge, New York.

[7] Kotze H, Janssen B, Koolen C, et al., 2021, Norms, Affect and Evaluation in the Reception of Literary Translations in Multilingual Online Reading Communities: Deriving Cognitive-Evaluative Templates from Big Data. Translation, Cognition & Behavior, 4(2): 147–186.

[8] Liu RY, 2025, Stylistic Interference as Creative Agency: A Case Study of Su Manshu’s Poetry Translation. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 12(3): 298–317.

[9] Givón T, 1991, Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1): 85–114.

[10] Xu ZM, 1990, The Complete Poems of Xu Zhimo, edited by Liang R, Zhejiang Literature & Art Publishing House, Hangzhou, 174–175 + 317–318.

Share
Back to top