ARTICLE
26 June 2026

From Blood Ties to Affective Contracts: The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Conceptions of Family in Chinese Animated Films of the New Century

Yapeng Li1 ,  Xiangyang Zheng1
Show Less
1 School of Art and Design, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
LNE 2026 , 4(6), 90–97; https://doi.org/10.26689/LNE.v4i6.15550
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Based on Confucian ethics, traditional Chinese animated movies presented the family through the kinship of the patriarch and the connection between family and the state, stressing the inheritance of bloodline, the authority of the father, and social responsibility. Since the start of the 21st century, urbanization, population change, and the pluralization of values have disrupted this structure. Present-day films reduce the importance of blood relations, vary the forms of family, doubt the domestic hierarchy, and show the family as both a place of trauma and a means of recovery. By carefully studying some typical works such as the White Snake trilogy, the Ne Zha series, The Legend of Hei and Deep Sea, this paper suggests that Chinese animation rebuilds the family based on an “emotional contract”: an ethical system maintained by choice, sympathy, mutual caring and emotional work. This change is not merely denying the inherited kinship, but re-interpreting the family as a dynamic community of belonging. Therefore, animation offers a significant means by which the contemporary changes in Chinese family ethics can be observed and discussed publicly.

Keywords
Chinese animated film
Conceptions of family
Blood ties
Affective contract
Deconstruction and reconstruction
Funding
The Project of the National Social Science Fund of China, “The Audiovisual Representation and International Communication of the Spiritual Genealogy of Chinese Communists” (Project No. 24BDJ054)
References

[1] Yang JH, He ZH, 2014, Family Change and Continuity in the Process of Social Transformation. Population Research, 38(2): 37.

[2] Liang SM, 2018, The Essence of Chinese Culture. Shanghai People’s Publishing House, Shanghai: 339.

[3] Fei XT, 2017, From the Soil; The System of Reproduction; Rural Reconstruction. The Commercial Press, Beijing: 40–57.

[4] Yang KS, 2012, The Psychology of the Chinese People. China Renmin University Press, Beijing: 201–205.

[5] Liu J, Huang SJ, 2010, On the Aesthetic Appeal of “Education through Entertainment” in Chinese Animation. Movie Literature, (20): 32.

[6] Tu XZ, 2021, Inheritance and Innovation in the Narrative Modes of Chinese Animated Films. Movie Literature, (8): 49–53.

[7] Wang R, 2023, An Analysis of the Changing Images of Family in Chinese Animated Films. Movie Literature, (5): 94–99.

[8] Ma GQ, 2023, Changes in Contemporary Chinese Families: Characteristics, Trends, and Prospects. Population Research, 47(1): 48.

[9] Yu ZQ, 2024, Chinese-Style Kinship Severance: The Evolution of Contemporary Kin Relations and the Reconstruction of Lifestyles. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (2): 99.

[10] Xu AQ, Yelesheyeva II, 2016, The Family in the Process of Modernization: China and Russia. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, Shanghai: 26.

[11] Guo ZH, 2026, The Affective Migration of Young People’s Intimate Relationships in the Digital Age. Population and Society, 42(4): 93–102.

[12] Bradshaw J, 2007, The Family Can Hurt: A New Opportunity for Self-Renewal. Translated by Zheng WY and Zhao JY. Sichuan University Press, Chengdu: 34.

[13] Liu MT, 2025, Chinese Family-Themed Filmmaking from the Perspective of “New Familism.” Movie Literature, (16): 40.

[14] He QH, Wang YT, 2025, Selective Re-Embedding: Online Kin-Making among “Weak-Kinship” Youth from the Perspective of Individualization—A Case Study of Douyin’s “Electronic Parents” Short Videos. Journal of Youth Studies, (5): 87.

Share
Back to top