ARTICLE
31 August 2026

Construction and Empirical Study of a Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model for a Narrative Medicine Clinical Ideological and Political Education Case Database

Haijiao Wang1 Jianchao Zheng2 Kai Yang1 Lanlan Cai1 Shuping Gao1
Show Less
1 Xiangyang No.1 People’s Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, China
2 The Fourth Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, China
JCNR 2026 , 10(8), 55–61; https://doi.org/10.26689/JCNR.v10i8.15370
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: The current implementation of clinical ideological and political education evaluation is confronted with prominent challenges, including an underdeveloped quantitative evaluation system, a paucity of empirical research data, and difficulty in sustaining long‑term educational outcomes. To address this dilemma, this study draws on the Kirkpatrick four‑level evaluation model to construct an evaluation framework centered on a narrative medicine clinical ideological and political education case database and examines its practical effects, with the aim of providing a reference for the quantitative evaluation of clinical ideological and political education. Methods: Because teaching arrangements precluded random assignment, this study formed a non‑randomized concurrent control design based on the year of entry into the department. Sixty clinical medicine interns from Xiangyang First People’s Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, in the 2025 academic year were selected as the control group and received conventional ideological and political teaching; 65 clinical medicine interns in the 2026 academic year were selected as the experimental group and received teaching using the narrative medicine case database. Before and after the intervention, assessments were conducted using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy, a professional identity scale, and objective structured clinical examinations, and verification was performed in conjunction with the quality of parallel charts. Results: The satisfaction rate at the reaction level in the experimental group was 92.3%, significantly higher than the 73.3% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between groups (P < 0.05). At the level of professional identity, 84% of the interns in the experimental group demonstrated a high level of identification with the medical profession, far exceeding the 63% in the control group (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Kirkpatrick four‑level model provides a novel perspective for this study. The application of the narrative medicine case database strengthened medical students’ empathy and professional identity and facilitated changes in clinical communication behaviors, demonstrating its value for clinical dissemination

Keywords
Kirkpatrick model
Narrative medicine
Curriculum ideological and political education
Case database
Effect evaluation
Funding
Hubei University of Medicine Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era Research Center Project (Project No.: HBYYXSX2601)
References

[1]       He X, Han Z, Ding Y, 2019, Theoretical and Practical Significance of Strengthening Ideal and Belief Education for the Construction of Medical Ethics and Conduct. Chinese Medical Ethics, 32(12): 1593–1594.

[2]       Li Z, Liu Y, 2024, Current Status and Influencing Factors of Medical Narrative Competence Among Clinical Medicine Graduates in Hebei Province. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 45(12): 1445–1450.

[3]       Xu R, Yang J, 2026, Application of Learning-Situation-Oriented Modular Reconstruction of “Literature and Medicine” in the Stratified Cultivation of Narrative Medicine Competence Among Medical Students. Medical Education Research and Practice, 34(2): 286–291.

[4]       Hong F, Hu Y, Liu P, 2017, Research Progress and Implications of Narrative Medicine Education. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 14(7): 530–534.

[5]       Guo L, Zhu L, Huang R, et al., 2023, Chinese Expert Consensus on Narrative Medicine (2023). Narrative Medicine, 6(6): 381–411.

[6]       Zhou X, Cao J, Yao X, et al., 2026, Exploration and Evaluation of a Blended Teaching Faculty Training Curriculum System Oriented by Post Competency. Chinese Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 10(1): 44–47.

[7]       Kirkpatrick DL, 1959, Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs: Reaction. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 18: 3–9.

[8]       Kirkpatrick DL, 1959, Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs: Learning. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 18: 21–26.

[9]       Kirkpatrick DL, 1960, Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs: Behavior. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 19: 13–18.

[10]     Kirkpatrick DL, 1960, Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs: Results. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 18: 28–32.

[11]     Hua Q, Dai X, Yin X, et al., 2022, Exploration on the Cultivation Path of Humanistic Care Ability Among Medical Students from the Perspective of Narrative Medicine. Medicine and Philosophy, 43(13): 68–72.

[12]     Chen L, Shen Y, 2025, Effect of Empathy Training on the Learning Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block Among Resident Physicians. China Higher Medical Education, 2025(1): 111–112.

Share
Back to top