Volume 10,Issue 9
Systematic Design of Teaching Model Reform for the Tax Law Course Based on the ADDIE Model
The digital economy has imposed compound competency requirements on the tax literacy of accounting and finance professionals. However, traditional Tax Law instruction faces three structural predicaments: insufficient learning motivation, the dual complexity of the knowledge system, and difficulty in disciplinary thinking transition. This study employs the ADDIE model as a systematic instructional design framework to construct a task-driven and values-infused blended teaching model in response to these challenges. Guided by the five-phase logic of ADDIE—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation—the model establishes a learner-centered, task-anchored, and values-oriented instructional design loop through five interrelated components: learner analysis and needs diagnosis, modularized content restructuring, multi-tiered task packages and case resource development, full-process blended teaching implementation, and diversified formative evaluation. The model effectively bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application while integrating professional competence development with values cultivation, thereby offering a replicable practical paradigm for the systematic teaching reform of business and finance courses.
[1] Annelin A, Boström G-O, 2023, An Assessment of Key Sustainability Competencies: A Review of Scales and Propositions for Validation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9): 53–69.
[2] Leicht A, Heiss J, Byun WJ, 2018, Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
[3] Aldoobie N, 2023, Educational Design and Evaluation Models of the Learning Effectiveness in E-Learning Process: A Systematic Review. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4): 318–347.
[4] Miller WF, Shawver TJ, Mintz SM, 2024, An Empirical Analysis of the Theoretical Foundation of the Giving Voice to Values Pedagogy. Accounting Education, 33(3): 319–337.
[5] Fogarty TJ, Sellers RD, Jones DE, 2023, Reverse Engineering Tax Education: How Tax Practice Can Inform the Classroom Experience. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1): 16.
[6] Hawk H, 2025, Unlocking the Potential: Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Accounting Education. Accounting Education, 34(6): 998–1025.
[7] Bloom BS, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay.
[8] Lave J, Wenger E, 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Wang Y, 2023, Task-Driven Teaching and Its Application in Business English Course. Journal of Higher Education Research, 44(2): 112–118.
[10] McCall M, Shelton RN, Crowley BN, et al., 2023, Doctoral Student Perceptions of a Project-Based Learning Approach in an Instructional Design Course. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(3): 1–9.
