ARTICLE
31 August 2026

Translating Educator Spirit into Pedagogical Practice: A Framework for Pre-Service EFL Teacher Education in China

Shuyi Lin1
Show Less
1 School of Foreign Languages, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
JCER 2026 , 10(8), 119–126; https://doi.org/10.26689/JCER.v10i8.15193
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Educator Spirit was articulated in China in 2023 as a set of expectations concerning teachers’ public commitment, moral conduct, pedagogical wisdom, professional learning, care for students, and cultural responsibility. Its subsequent incorporation into national policy places a direct task before teacher education: how can a broad image of good teacherhood enter the professional learning of student-teachers? This paper addresses this question through a policy-informed curriculum analysis of a pre-service English as a foreign language (EFL) methodology course. It reads recent teacher-education policy alongside research on teacher identity and professional judgment, and develops four connected areas for curriculum design: professional purpose, ethical responsibility, pedagogical judgment, and relational care. Three course sites—classroom management, assessment, and language-and-culture teaching—are used to show how these areas can be worked through as problems of teaching. The paper argues that Educator Spirit gains practical meaning when student-teachers have to explain and revise decisions about real pedagogical situations. This approach connects value education with subject pedagogy and provides a workable route for curriculum-based ideological and political education in pre-service EFL teacher education.

Keywords
Educator Spirit
Pre-service EFL teacher education
Professional identity;
Pedagogical judgment
Curriculum-based ideological and political education
Funding
This paper was part of the completion requirements for the 2024 Curriculum-based Ideological and Political Education Project of the Minjiang University Research Base, Fujian Research Center for Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era (Project No. YJJD202407C), “Research on Integrating Educator Spirit into Curriculum-based Ideological and Political Education in University EFL Teacher Education Courses,” led by Shuyi Lin.
References

[1] Xi J, 2023, Letter to Representatives of Outstanding Teachers Nationwide. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, September 9, 2023. https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_176/202309/t20230909_1079296.html (accessed August 6, 2026).

[2] CPC Central Committee and State Council, 2024, Opinions on Promoting Educator Spirit and Strengthening the High-quality Professional Teacher Workforce in the New Era. August 6, 2024. China Government Website; official mirror hosted by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/zyygwj/202409/t20240902_1084959.shtml (accessed August 6, 2026).

[3] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, Notice on Issuing the Guidelines for Curriculum-based Ideological and Political Education in Higher Education. Document No. Jiaogao [2020] 3, May 28, 2020. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html (accessed August 6, 2026).

[4] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, and State Commission Office of Public Sectors Reform, 2018, Notice on Issuing the Action Plan for Revitalizing Teacher Education (2018–2022). Document No. Jiaoshi [2018] 2, February 11, 2018. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201803/t20180323_331063.html (accessed August 6, 2026).

[5] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China and seven other departments, 2022, Notice on Issuing the New Era Strong Teachers Plan for Basic Education. Document No. Jiaoshi [2022] 6, April 2, 2022. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/202204/t20220413_616644.html (accessed August 6, 2026).

[6] Beijaard D, Meijer PC, Verloop N, 2004, Reconsidering Research on Teachers’ Professional Identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.

[7] Rushton EAC, Rawlings Smith E, Steadman S, Towers E, 2023, Understanding Teacher Identity in Teachers’ Professional Lives: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Education, 11(2): e3417. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3417.

[8] Varghese M, Morgan B, Johnston B, Johnson KA, 2005, Theorizing Language Teacher Identity: Three Perspectives and Beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4(1): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2.

[9] Korthagen FAJ, 2004, In Search of the Essence of a Good Teacher: Towards a More Holistic Approach in Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1): 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002.

[10] Biesta G, 2015, What Is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.

[11] Beauchamp C, Thomas L, 2009, Understanding Teacher Identity: An Overview of Issues in the Literature and Implications for Teacher Education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2): 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252.

[12] Flores MA, Day C, 2006, Contexts Which Shape and Reshape New Teachers’ Identities: A Multi-perspective Study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002.

Share
Back to top