ARTICLE
16 July 2026
The Internal Logic, Practical Dilemmas, and Implementation Paths of Ideological and Political Education in Smoking Control Practice in Universities
Huiping Han Hong Zhang Wen Lu Lei Chen
Show Less
1 Director of Campus Management Center, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China,
2 Secretary-General and Director of University Department, Beijing Youth Legal and Psychological Counseling Service Center, Beijing, China,
3 Deputy General Manager of Logistics Group, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China,
4 Teacher and Student Service Platform, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China,
JCER 2026 , 10(6), 323–329; https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v10i6.15512
© 2026 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Campus smoking control is a key link in building a healthy campus and implementing the fundamental task of fostering virtue through education in universities. At present, the smoking control work in universities is confronted with a prominent contradiction between students’ demands and managerial effectiveness, and pure administrative regulation fails to solve the problem fundamentally. Based on the practical context, this study proposes a theoretical framework and practical path for the systematic integration of ideological and political education (IPE) into campus smoking control. By analyzing the internal logic of IPE-enabled smoking control in resolving value conflicts, reshaping cultural cognition, and guiding behavioral self-discipline, this paper systematically reveals the practical dilemmas of university smoking control concerning group psychology, management boundaries, subculture, educational resources, legal implementation, and smoking cessation services. On this basis, it constructs a systematic implementation path centered on the three dimensions of “value guidance, cultural immersion, and behavioral coordination,” framed by a “three-in-one” model and guaranteed by a “four-dimensional linkage” evaluation and incentive mechanism. This research aims to promote the transformation of smoking control from external constraints to internal recognition, foster a smoke-free campus culture, and provide a systematic solution for the collaborative development of environmental education and cultural education in universities.

References
Xinhua News Agency, 2025, The Outline of Education Power Construction Plan (2024–2035).
Huai JP, 2024, Deepening Comprehensive Educational Reform, People’s Daily, August 21, 2024, (9).
World Health Organization, 2023, Global Tobacco Epidemic Report, WHO, Geneva.
Yang SZ, 2002, The Integration of Scientific and Humanistic Education: An Inevitable Path for Cultivating High-End Talents. China University Teaching, (10): 11–14.
Wang ZR, 2024, The Implication and Practical Path of Strengthening the Collaboration Between Scientific and Humanistic Education. China Higher Education, (20): 31–36.
Xiang XM, 2020, The Crisis of Science and Humanities in Contemporary School Education. Educational Research of Universities, (08): 48–51 + 58.
Xiao F, 2002, Scientific Spirit and Humanistic Spirit, Renmin University of China Press, Beijing.
Li XY, Niu JM, 2014, The Coupling of University Humanistic Education and Scientific Education. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, (11): 7–9.
Share
Back to top