ARTICLE
26 June 2026

A Systematic Review: On the Comparative Study of Teacher Digital Literacy Frameworks in Europe, the UK, and China

Xiaoyan Fu1* Stylianos Hatzipanagos2 Oscar Mwaanga2
Show Less
1 Gansu Open University, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China
2 University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK
EIR 2026 , 4(6), 102–118; https://doi.org/10.26689/EIR.v4i6.15528
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study provides a systematic review and comparative analysis of teacher digital literacy frameworks from the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), China, and UNESCO. Seven frameworks are examined: DigCompEdu, the Jisc Digital Capabilities Framework, the Digital Teaching Professional Framework (DTPF), the Professional Standards Framework (PSF), China’s Digital Literacy Framework for Teachers (2022), UNESCO’s ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (ICT-CFT), and UNESCO’s AI Competency Framework for Teachers (2024). The seven frameworks were examined from six aspects: content coverage, applicability, integrability, implementation support, innovation and future orientation, and impact and effectiveness. Several elements appear repeatedly across the frameworks, particularly the use of technology in teaching, information and data literacy, ethical practice, digital pedagogy, professional development, and learner empowerment. However, the frameworks do not give the same weight to these areas. They also differ in whom they are designed for, how they are intended to be used, and how far they address newer technologies. Some of these differences can be understood from the educational and policy backgrounds in which the frameworks were developed. Another point emerging from the comparison is that teacher digital literacy is no longer concerned mainly with the ability to use technology. Pedagogy, ethics, professional practice, and more recently AI have become increasingly visible in these frameworks. This study therefore provides a basis for understanding how teacher digital literacy has been approached in different contexts and what needs to be considered when existing frameworks are used elsewhere.

Keywords
Teacher digital literacy
Digital competence
Comparative analysis
Competency frameworks
Systematic review
Digital education
Funding
This work was supported by the 2025 Gansu Provincial University Teachers Innovation Fund Project, “Key Elements and Promotion Paths of Teachers’ Digital Literacy in Higher Education under the Background of Educational Digitalization” (Project No.: 2025B-310).
References

[1] European Commission, 2020, Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting Education and Training for the Digital Age. https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document-library-docs/deap-communication-sept2020_en.pdf

[2] Gilster P, 1997, Digital Literacy. John Wiley, New Jersey.

[3] Martin A, Grudziecki J, 2006, DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 2006(4): 249–267.

[4] UNESCO, 2018, A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org

[5] Council of the European Union, 2018, Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 2018(C189): 1–13. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)

[6] Falloon G, 2020, From Digital Literacy to Digital Competence: The Teacher Digital Competency (TDC) Framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020(68): 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

[7] Fernández-Batanero JM, Román-Graván P, Montenegro-Rueda M, et al., 2021, Digital Teaching Competence in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 2021(11): 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110689

[8] Ministry of Education of China, 2022, Digital Literacy Framework for Teachers. Ministry of Education.

[9] European Commission, 2017, Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu): Developing Digital Competence in Education. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu

[10] Jisc, 2015, Building Digital Capabilities: The Six Elements Defined. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/building-digital-capability

[11] ISTE, 2017, ISTE Standards for Coaches. International Society for Technology in Education. https://www.iste.org

[12] Mishra P, Koehler MJ, 2006, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 2006(6): 1017–1054.

[13] ISTE, 2017, ISTE Standards for Educators. https://www.iste.org/

[14] OECD, 2021, Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en

[15] Education and Training Foundation, 2018, Taking learning to the next level: Digital Teaching Professional Framework. Education and Training Foundation.

[16] UNESCO, 2017, Working Group on Education: Digital Skills for Life and Work. Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. https://broadbandcommission.org

[17] Advance HE, 2023, Professional Standards Framework for Teaching and Supporting Learning in Higher Education (PSF 2023). Advance HE.

[18] UNESCO, 2018, UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers: Version 3. UNESCO.

[19] Miao F, Cukurova M, 2024, AI Competency Framework for Teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Share
Back to top