Research on the Shaping of Individual Low-Carbon Psychology in British Political Socialization from the Perspective of Regional Country Studies

This study took the Oxford, United Kingdom (UK), area as a case to explore the path of policy intervention on the formation of individual low-carbon psychology. By analyzing the material lifestyle, behavioral convenience, traditional living habits, and individual economic interests, the study revealed the influence of these factors on the individual carbon footprint and low-carbon psychology. The study examined policy interventions that Oxford had implemented to encourage the formation of low-carbon behavior and psychology. This paper also makes policy suggestions to encourage China’s low-carbon consumption behavior, aiming to encourage low-carbon behavioral psychology through policy guidance and to jointly build a more sustainable future.

References

Hu AG, 2021, China’s Goal of Achieving Carbon Peak by 2030 and Its Main Approaches. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 21(3): 1–15.

Hodson M, Marvin S, 2013, Low Carbon Nation? Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203583043

Wang JM, 2010, Consumer Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection Behaviors and Their Impact Mechanisms. China Social Sciences Press, Beijing.

Amsari D, Wahyuni ES, Fadhilaturrahmi F, 2024, 1. The Social Learning Theory Albert Bandura for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(2): 1654–1662. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i2.7247

Wang JM, Wang JH, 2011, An Exploratory Study Based on Grounded Theory on the Influencing Factors Model of Public Low-carbon Consumption Patterns and Government Regulatory Policies. Journal of Management World, 2011(4): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2011.04.008

Wang JM, He AZ, 2011, Psychological Attribution and Policy Paths of Consumer’s Low Carbon Consumption Behavior: An Exploratory Research Based on Grounded Theory. Nankai Business Review, 14(4): 80–89 + 99.

Ashcroft E, Bean F, McNelly C, et al., 2021, 2040 NetZero Action Plan Report. Carbon Trust, London, 7.

Oxford City Council, 2020, Oxford Local Plan 203. http://www.forestry.gov.uk

Social Research Institute, 2019, Oxford Citizens’ Assembly on Climate Change: A Summary Report Prepared for Oxford City Council. www.ipsos-mori.com

Oxford City Council, 2021, Zero Carbon Oxford Summit. http://www.forestry.gov.uk

Yu GR, Hao TX, Zhu JX, 2022, Discussion on China’s Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Action Strategies. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(4): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220121001

Ren L, 2009, Policies and Inspirations for Developing Low-Carbon Economy Abroad. Development Research, 2009(2): 23–27.

Tang B, Yang JQ, 2022, Green Low-Carbon Urban Regeneration: Experience and Enlightenment from the Republic of Korea. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 38(1): 124–128.

Lu XB, Chen T, Ding JF, 2022, Implications of EU’s Green Low Carbon Policy and Mechanism on China. Urban Planning Forum, 2022(S1): 272–278.

Pan HX, Tang Y, Wu JY, et al., 2008, Spatial Planning Strategy for Low-Carbon Cities in China. Urban Planning Forum, 2008(6): 57–64.

Zhang A, Zhang YL, Kong ML, et al., 2010, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Landscape Architecture—In Order to Achieve Low-Carbon Society. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 26(6): 31–34.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue