Doctoral Qualification Examination System Research Literature Review

Doctoral education, representing the pinnacle of talent development within higher education, serves as a quintessential showcase of a nation’s higher education and research benchmarks. This study undertakes empirical research by examining the evolution and transformation of doctoral qualifying examinations in Western developed countries, while also scrutinizing the pilot initiatives of such examinations in China. The objective is to delve into the implications for doctoral education cultivation in the country, ultimately striving to elevate the quality and international standing of doctoral education.

References

Xiao WH, 2022, Characteristics and Implications of the Quality Assurance System for Doctoral Education at the University of California, Berkeley. Future and Development, 46(1): 61–65.

Degree Center of Ministry of Education, 2021, Top Ten Hotspots in Chinese Graduate Education in 2020. Journal of China Graduate Education, 2021(1): 2–9.

Chinese Doctoral Quality Analysis Research Group, 2010, Chinese Doctoral Quality Report. Peking University Press, Beijing.

Qiao XF, Yu SL, 2013, Dilemmas and Solutions in Cultivating PhD Students in Foreign Language Disciplines: An Exploration Based on the Doctoral Qualifying Examination System. Graduate Education Research, 2013(10): 25–29.

Yu SL, Qiao XF, 2012, Doctoral Qualification Examination: Filter or Navigator? Degree and Graduate Education, 2012(9): 64–67.

Huang HG, 2010, Order in the Jungle: The Transformation of Doctoral Education in the United States, thesis, Beijing Normal University.

Yang G, Yang J, 2004, Analysis and Reference of the Doctoral Qualification Examination System in the United States. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), 2004(2): 35–38.

Wei HF, Gu JB, 2015, Analysis of the Doctoral Qualification Examination Model in the United States. Graduate Education Research, 2015(5): 90–95.

Zhou LB, Jin GD, 1985, A Survey Report on Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin in the United States. Degree and Graduate Education, 1985(1): 92–96.

Wang QQ, 1985, Introduction to Graduate Education in Agricultural Economics at the University of Wisconsin in the United States. Higher Agricultural Education, 1985(S3): 42–44.

Jin GD, Zhou LB, 1984, Graduate Education at Madison University School of Engineering, Wisconsin, USA. Higher Education Research, 1984(3): 86–91.

Chen Y, Zhai Y, 2017, A Key Link in Doctoral Training: Practice and Enlightenment of the Doctoral Qualification Examination at the University of California, Berkeley. Degree and Graduate Education, 2017(8): 68–72.

Xiao WH, 2022, Characteristics and Implications of the Quality Assurance System for Doctoral Education at the University of California, Berkeley. Future and Development, 46(1): 61–65.

Zhou WW, 2020, Analysis and Insights into the Quality Assurance System for Doctoral Education at North Carolina State University. Degree and Graduate Education, 2020(6): 64–70.

Wei HF, Gu JB, 2015, Analysis of the Doctoral Qualification Examination Model in the United States. Graduate Education Research, 2015(5): 90–95.

Yu SL, Qiao XF, 2012, Doctoral Qualification Examination: Filter or Navigator? Degree and Graduate Education, 2012(9): 64–67.

Zhuang Z, Zheng QS, Feng XQ, et al., 2005, Discussion on the Construction and Quality Management of Graduate Courses in Solid Mechanics. Degree and Graduate Education, 2005(2): 36–41.

Guan H, Jia BY, 2012, Practice and Exploration of Doctoral Qualification Examination System — Taking Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences as an Example. Graduate Education Research, 2012(4): 45–49.

Luo YZ, Qu FT, 2007, Implementing the Doctoral Qualification Examination to Strengthen the Evaluation of Scientific Research Potential. Degree and Graduate Education, 2007(S1): 74–77.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue