ARTICLE
30 June 2026

Knowledge Integration and Green Supply Chain Resource Management in NEV Manufacturing: A Practice-Informed View

Shenfan Zou1
Show Less
1 Rattana Bundit University, Bangkok, Thailand
SDS 2026 , 2(3), 226–231; https://doi.org/10.26689/SDS.v2i3.16181
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Does knowledge integration actually make green supply chain resource management work better? This paper takes up that question in China’s NEV manufacturing sector. Three contextual forces receive attention: ASEAN green standard adoption, Zhuang-Chinese bilingual knowledge transfer, and responses to technology iteration. The evidence is practice-based and conceptual. A mismatch appears. Firms have built fairly capable knowledge-integrating routines, and they also run a range of green resource programs. Yet the two do not line up closely. Integration capacity rarely converts directly into measurable sustainability performance. The bottleneck is not knowledge shortage but conversion. External standards, bilingual information, and technical updates become valuable only when they are translated into supplier requirements, shop-floor routines, and traceable material, energy, and carbon records. Knowledge integration is therefore treated as enabling infrastructure. Whether it pays off depends on downstream execution.

Keywords
Knowledge integration
Green supply chain
New energy vehicles
ASEAN standards
Bilingual knowledge transfer
Sustainable resource management
References

[1]   General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, New Energy Vehicle Industry Development Plan (2021–2035), visited on February 10, 2026, https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5560291.htm.

[2]   Cheng TCE, Kamble SS, Belhadi A, Ndubisi NO, Lai KH, Kharat MG, 2022, Linkages Between Big Data Analytics, Circular Economy, Sustainable Supply Chain Flexibility, and Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Production Research, 60(22): 6908–6922.

[3]   Cohen WM, Levinthal DA, 1990, Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.

[4]   Chen L, Jia F, Steward MD, Schoenherr T, 2022, The Role of Technology in Enabling Circular Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 106: A1–A6.

[5]   Grant RM, 1996, Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122.

[6]   Hart SL, 1995, A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 986–1014.

[7]   Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai KH, 2011, An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1): 1–15.

[8]   Zahra SA, George G, 2002, Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185–203.

Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top