ARTICLE
30 September 2026

A Study on the Economic Effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: Mechanisms, Empirical Evidence, and Reflections

Fan Jiang1 ,  Yuhong Li2
Show Less
1 Academic Affairs Office, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, Anhui, China
2 School of Economics and Management, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, Anhui, China
PBES 2026 , 9(9), 177–186; https://doi.org/10.26689/PBES.v9i9.15617
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Over the past decade since the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was proposed, the economics literature has grown exponentially, yet empirical findings have become increasingly divergent. This paper is not a simple literature compilation, but rather a deep integration with methodological self-awareness. It traces three strands of theoretical mechanisms—gravity model extensions, institutional economics, and global value chain restructuring—and then focuses on four core areas: trade, investment, debt, and the environment. For each area, it dissects the research design, identification strategies, and inherent vulnerabilities of key studies. The findings indicate that infrastructure improvements have indeed generated trade creation and energy reduction effects. However, the parallel trends assumption in difference-in-differences designs, the choice of spatial spillover matrices, and the lack of general equilibrium feedback pose significant challenges to external validity. In the investment domain, case-specific inferences using synthetic control methods are susceptible to sparse weighting, and the ownership heterogeneity between state-owned and private enterprises has yet to be adequately incorporated into structural estimations. The debt trap narrative lacks systematic empirical support, while parameter calibration issues and the unavailability of loan-term data have kept the debate largely at the discursive level. This paper argues that methodological fragmentation, scarce micro-level data, and the absence of dynamic perspectives collectively constrain theoretical accumulation. Future research must confront three persistent tensions—between internal and external validity, between partial and general equilibrium, and between case-specific inference and average effects—and shift from “policy effect identification” to “mechanism deconstruction and conditional analysis.” Advancing project-level database construction, cross-method robustness comparisons, and country-specific systematic risk assessments will also be essential.

Keywords
Belt and Road Initiative
Trade effects
Foreign direct investment
Causal identification
Synthetic control method
Debt sustainability
References

[1] Xi J, 2017, Join Hands to Advance the Belt and Road Initiative—Speech at the Opening Ceremony of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. Gazette of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, (15): 6–10.

[2] National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Commerce, 2015, Vision and Actions on Jointly Building the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. International Communication, (4): 4–9.

[3] Liu W, et al., 2017, Research on the Belt and Road Strategy, Beijing: The Commercial Press, 23–56.

[4] Lu F, Li Y, Yang Y, 2015, The Belt and Road and Infrastructure Connectivity. International Economic Review, (3): 28–43.

[5] Li Y, 2022, Research on the Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on Sovereign Debt Risk of Countries Along the Route: An Analysis Based on Synthetic Control Method and Public Risk Theory. South China Finance, (3): 51–62.

[6] Yang Q, Wang Q, 2021, The Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on Government Debt of Countries Along the Route. Public Finance Research, (2): 111–129.

[7] Zhang H, Jiang F, 2020, Research on the Motivation and Path of Europe’s Integration into the Belt and Road Construction. Intertrade, (10): 69–79.

[8] World Bank, 2019, Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors, Washington DC, World Bank, 87–124.

[9] Zhang Y, 2019, Institutional Quality and the Cooperation Effects of the Belt and Road Initiative. World Economics and Politics, (6): 4–25.

[10] Wang M, 2021, Alignment between the Belt and Road Initiative and Existing International Institutions: From the Perspective of Institutional Complexity. Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies, (6): 48–77.

[11] Liu Z, Chen L, 2018, Reconstruction of Global Value Chains and Belt and Road Production Capacity Cooperation. Academic Monthly, 50(6): 52–63.

[12] Zhou R, Hong X, Lin X, 2022, China’s Outward Direct Investment and Digital Economy Innovation in the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 44(6): 70–83.

[13] Sheng B, Guo T, 2017, Trade Effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: An Empirical Study Based on the Gravity Model. Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), (4): 56–67.

[14] Sun C, Zhang N, Liu Y, 2017, The Belt and Road Initiative and China’s Trade Growth with Countries Along the Route. International Economics and Trade Research, 33(8): 58–73.

[15] Zhao G, Li J, 2024, Research on the Impact of Trade Facilitation on Enterprise Energy Consumption Intensity: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China-Europe Railway Express under the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 43(12): 112–122.

[16] Mao Y, Ye L, Li S, 2025, Maritime Connectivity of the Belt and Road Initiative and Trade Growth of Partner Countries. Intertrade, (2): 50–62.

[17] Xu H, Xia J, 2025, Jointly Building the Belt and Road and Optimizing Trade Competition-Complementarity Relations. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 39(4): 56–67.

[18] Pei C, Fan Y, 2020, Theoretical Explanations of Chinese Enterprises’ Outward Investment and the Belt and Road Practice. Economic Research Journal, 55(2): 4–19.

[19] Li J, Gan J, Yang X, 2019, How Does the Belt and Road Initiative Affect the Transformation and Upgrading of Chinese Enterprises. South China Journal of Economics, (4): 1–22.

[20] Liu Y, Hu L, Synthetic Control Method Assessment of Investment Risks in Countries Along the Belt and Road. China Industrial Economics, 2019, (7): 87–105.

[21] Jiang G, 2020, The Belt and Road Initiative and the Location Choice of Chinese Enterprises’ Outward Investment. The Journal of World Economy, 43(8): 79–102.

[22] Hurley J, Morris S, Portelance G, 2019, Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective. Center for Global Development Policy Paper.

[23] Blanchard O, Acalin J, 2019, China’s Belt and Road Initiative: How Much Debt is Being Incurred? PIIE Policy Brief.

[24] Qiu Y, Pan P, Zhang L, 2021, Has the “China Solution” Really Laid a Debt Trap?: Empirical Evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative. World Economy Studies, (7): 120–134 + 137.

[25] Xu Q, Chen Y, 2021, Debt Sustainability Analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative: A Critical Review. International Economic Review, (3): 78–97.

[26] Zhao S, Chen C, Guo C, et al., 2026, Analysis of Embodied Carbon Transfer and Driving Factors in Manufacturing under the Belt and Road Initiative. China Environmental Science, 46(2): 1125–1138.

[27] Chen F, Xia Y, Zou M, et al., 2025, Assessment of Carbon Sink Potential for Ecological Restoration of Mining Areas in Belt and Road Partner Countries. Journal of China Coal Society, 50(6): 2789–2801.

[28] Liu J, Deng X, 2022, Research on Labor Risks of Investment in Southeast Asian Countries Along the Belt and Road. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (1): 184–192.

[29] Gao L, 2023, Research on the Model of the Belt and Road Initiative Promoting Economic Globalization. World Economy Studies, (6): 14–25 + 134.

[30] Wang Y, Zhang J, 2022, Methodological Divergence between Structural Estimation and Reduced-Form Estimation in Trade Policy Evaluation. Economic Perspectives, (5): 98–114.

[31] Chen Q, 2022, Causal Inference in Econometrics: Debates and Consensus. The Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 39(7): 5–25.

[32] Zhang C, 2023, Endogeneity and External Validity in Policy Evaluation: Taking Belt and Road Research as an Example. Economic Research Journal, 58(4): 16–32.

[33] Qin J, Cao M, 2025, China’s Approach to Risk Governance of Cross-Border Data Flows under the Belt and Road Initiative. Southwest Finance, (4): 44–56.

[34] Yang Q, Zhang B, Yu Y, 2025, Evolution of China’s Renewable Energy Export Trade Pattern: Evidence from Belt and Road Partner Countries. Intertrade, (4): 75–85.

[35] Huang Y, Dai X, Li L, 2025, Risk Analysis of China’s Overseas Railway Project Construction under the Belt and Road Initiative: From the Perspective of Institutional Distance. Development Research, (1): 25–33.

[36] Zhang M, Wang Z, 2024, Political Risk and Investment Security in Countries Along the Belt and Road. Studies of International Finance, (3): 55–65.

[37] Li X, 2024, High-Standard Construction and Rule Alignment of the Belt and Road Initiative. World Economics and Politics, (8): 2–24.

[38] Wang Y, Ma X, 2025, From “Going Out” to “Going In”: The Institutional Logic of the Evolution of China’s Outward Direct Investment Rules. Management World, 41(1): 88–106.

[39] Cao X, Li S, 2021, The Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on Economic Growth of Countries Along the Route and China’s Role. World Economy Studies, (10): 13–24 + 134.

[40] Zhao Y, Zhao X, Ma X, et al., 2025, The Belt and Road Initiative Promotes the Upgrading of Micro Market Entities in Partner Countries: Distinctive Evidence Based on Total Factor Productivity Improvement of Local Enterprises. World Economy Studies, (10): 62–75 + 136.

Share
Back to top