ARTICLE
23 October 2026

Application Effect of Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Chang Ju1
Show Less
1 Department of Gynecology, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an 710068, Shaanxi, China
JCNR 2026 , 10(9), 216–224; https://doi.org/10.26689/JCNR.v10i9.15822
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee: Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: To explore the application effect of comprehensive pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy in patients with myofascial pelvic pain syndrome (MPPS). Methods: A total of 84 MPPS patients admitted to the pelvic floor rehabilitation clinic of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from December 2023 to June 2025 were divided into an observation group and a control group, with 42 cases in each group. The control group received pelvic floor electrical stimulation, while the observation group received a 5-week, 15-session comprehensive pelvic floor rehabilitation program including myofascial manual release, diaphragmatic breathing training, electrical stimulation, biofeedback, magnetic stimulation and home Kegel training. The numerical rating scale (NRS) of pelvic floor pain and the dyspareunia scores were compared before treatment, at the end of treatment and one month after treatment; the Glazer surface electromyography (sEMG) parameters and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scores were compared at the end of treatment; clinical efficacy was also evaluated. Results: At the end of treatment and at the one-month follow-up, the observation group showed significantly lower NAS scores, pre-/post-resting potentials and the coefficient of variation of pre-resting potential, and higher amplitudes of rapid, sustained and endurance contractions, together with lower NHP scores and dyspareunia scores, than the control group (all p < 0.05); the total effective rate was 92.3% in the observation group versus 73.7% in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy can effectively relieve pelvic floor pain, reduce pelvic floor muscle hypertonicity and improve pelvic floor electrophysiological function and quality of life in MPPS patients, and is superior to electrical stimulation alone.

Keywords
Myofascial pelvic pain syndrome
Comprehensive rehabilitation
Physical therapy
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Nursing
Funding
Science and Technology Development Incubation Fund of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (Project No.: 2023HL-29)
References

[1]       Yu H, Gao G, Li J, et al., 2022, Research Progress in Physical Therapy for Female Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics, 12(8): 93–96.

[2]       Yao S, Shen Y, 2020, New Advances in the Treatment of Pelvic Myofascial Pain. Modern Obstetrics and Gynecology Progress, 29(5): 389–391.

[3]       Abreu-Mendes P, Baranowski A, Berghmans B, et al., 2023, Myofascial Pelvic Pain: Best Orientation and Clinical Practice-Position of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Chronic Pelvic Pain. European Urology Focus, 9(3): 533–544.

[4]       Shandong Pain Medicine Association, Liu Y, Zhang S, et al., 2021, Expert Consensus on Clinical Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women (2021 Edition). Beijing Medical Journal, 43(7): 650–659.

[5]       Wang L, Huang H, Chen M, et al., 2024, Study on the Therapeutic Effects of Different Magnetic Stimulation Pelvic Floor Modes on Perimenopausal Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Chongqing Medical Journal, 53(5): 712–716.

[6]       Yan S, Wang C, Li X, et al., 2022, Observation on the Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Electrostimulation Combined with Myofascial Massage in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain. Beijing Medical Journal, 44(12): 1147–1150.

[7]       Guo H, Fu T, Zou C, et al., 2020, Clinical Efficacy of Electrical Stimulation Combined with Manual Massage in the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 42(1): 55–59.

[8]       Jiao Z, Wang N, Qiu J, et al., 2022, Intervention Effect of Abdominal Breathing Combined with Electrical Stimulation and Biofeedback on Postpartum Pelvic Myofascial Pain. Journal of Nursing, 37(2): 29–31.

[9]       Zhou X, Zhang L, Su A, 2023, Observation on the Effect of Sacral Nerve Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Pelvic Floor Muscle Rehabilitation Training in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 21(11): 1894–1897.

[10]     Stecco L, 2018, Myofascial Manipulation for Musculoskeletal Pain. Translated by Guan L. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House: 86–102.

[11]     Hunt S, McEwen J, 1980, The Development of a Subjective Health Indicator. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2(3): 231–246.

[12]     Ashtiani E, Shokouhi N, Mohseni M, et al., 2023, A Novel Radiofrequency Modulation Therapy Versus Routine Physiotherapy Modalities in Treatment of Myofascial Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 66(3): 230–240.

[13]     Zhu M, Huang F, Xu J, et al., 2024, Efficacy and Factors of Myofascial Release Therapy Combined with Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. Open Medicine, 19(1): 20240936.

[14]     Fitzgerald M, Payne C, Lukacz E, et al., 2012, Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Myofascial Physical Therapy in Women with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome and Pelvic Floor Tenderness. Journal of Urology, 187(6): 2113–2118.

[15]     Yang Z, Zhang W, Li X, et al., 2021, Clinical Analysis of the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain Syndrome by Electrostimulation Biofeedback Combined with Manual Massage. Ningxia Medical Journal, 43(7): 598–600.

Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top