Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Perforation
Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair in the treatment of gastroduodenal perforation. Methods: 96 patients with gastroduodenal perforation admitted to our hospital from March 2025 to March 2026 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to the surgical plan, with 48 patients in each group. The control group underwent traditional laparotomy perforation repair, and the observation group underwent laparoscopic perforation repair. The surgery-related indicators and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time of the observation group was slightly longer than that of the control group; however, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly less; the time to get out of bed and hospital stay were shorter; and the postoperative complication rate was lower (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair has the characteristics of less trauma, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer complications when treating gastroduodenal perforation. The overall safety and therapeutic effect are better than traditional laparotomy. It is suitable for gradual promotion and use in primary hospitals. It will be more applicable to patients with a shorter onset time and acceptable basic physical conditions.
[1] Zhu J, Li M, Li K, et al., 2026, Effects of Laparoscopic Continuous Suture and Interrupted Suture Repair of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer on Suturing Time and Early Postoperative Recovery Process. Heilongjiang Medical Science, 49(8): 97–99.
[2] Sun S, Pu Q, 2026, Application Effect of One-Way Barbed Suture in Laparoscopic Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation Repair. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 51(1): 111–114.
[3] Huang Z, Mao W, Huang B, et al., 2025, Comparing the Effects of Laparoscopic Repair and Subtotal Gastrectomy in the Treatment of Acute Perforation of Gastroduodenal Ulcer. Primary Medicine Forum, 29(36): 86–89.
[4] Liu J, Xu H, Lan N, 2025, Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Different Laparoscopic Repair Methods in the Treatment of Emergency Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation. Disease Monitoring and Control, 19(6): 452–455.
[5] Zhang C, Chen K, Cao N, et al., 2025, Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer. Smart Health, 11(30): 36–39.
[6] Wang Y, Feng M, 2025, Effects of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy on Serum Inflammatory Factor Levels in Elderly Patients with Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation. Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 35(12): 84–87.
[7] Zhou R, Mei J, Zhang S, 2024, Experience in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation with Laparoscopic Repair. Zhejiang Trauma Surgery, 29(7): 1273–1275.
[8] Liu H, Du Y, Guo M, 2024, Safety and Short-Term Effects of Laparoscopic and Open Perforation Repair in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation. Henan Journal of Surgery, 30(4): 116–118.
