Keywords
BOPPPS
Teaching model
Submitted : 2025-08-27
Accepted : 2025-09-11
Published : 2025-09-26
Abstract
This paper explores the application of the BOPPPS teaching model in Space English education to address the limitations of traditional methods. Incorporating the six steps of the BOPPPS model—Bridge-in, Learning Outcomes, Pre-assessment, Participation, Post-assessment, and Summary—into Space English classrooms can enhance student engagement, improve cross-cultural communication, and combine space knowledge and language proficiency, ultimately improving the effectiveness of Space English teaching and better preparing students for global space collaboration.
References
News Burst Mag, 2023, Space Exploration: International Collaboration beyond the Earth. News Burst Mag, November 29, 2023, accessed on June 1, 2025. https://www.newsburstmag.com/space-exploration-international-collaboration-beyond-the-earth/
Crystal D, 1996, English as a Global Language, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
George PJ, Pease GM, Tyburski TE, 2005, A Management Model for International Participation in Space Exploration Missions. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 42(3): 567–578.
Cheng HL, 2023, Intercultural Communication and English Reading and Writing Teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3): 456–478.
Zhang JX, Zhu L, 2016, Effective Classroom Teaching Design Based on BOPPPS Model. Vocational and Technical Education, 37(11): 25–28.
University of British Columbia, 2025, Designing Lessons with BOPPPS. Accessed on June 1, 2025. https://researchcentres.wlu.ca/teaching-and-learning/building/designing-lessons-with- boppps.html
Li Y, 2016, Effective Teaching: Application of BOPPPS Model in ESL Class. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 2016(20): 433–440.
Pattison P, Russell D, 2006, Instructional Skills Workshop Handbook. UBC Centre for Teaching and Academic Growth, Vancouver.
Zeng DH, 2024, Research on Blended Teaching in Integrated English Course Based on BOPPPS Model. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(9): 134–138.
Renner PF, 1977, Some of the Reasons and Advantages of Clearly Stated Instructional Objectives. BCIT Developments, 1977(2): 2.
Bloom BS, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, Denver.
Oberg C, 2025, Guiding Classroom Instruction through Performance Assessment. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment. Accessed on June 1, 2025. http://aabri.com/manuscripts/09257.pdf
Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, et al., 2005, Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-based Practices. Journal of College Teaching, 5(1): 1–10.
Anderson L, Krathwohl D, Bloom BS, 2000, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York.
Chen BW, 2024, The Study on the Method of Introduction, Transition, and Summary Techniques in University Classroom Teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 5(2): 88–105.