Research on the Application of the Transparency Principle in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

EU Artificial Intelligence Act
Transparency principle
Application issues

DOI

10.26689/ief.v3i8.12068

Submitted : 2025-08-27
Accepted : 2025-09-11
Published : 2025-09-26

Abstract

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act establishes the principle of transparency to ensure the traceability, interpretability, and communicability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. This principle is reflected to varying degrees in AI systems of different risk levels, with particularly stringent requirements for high-risk AI systems. However, in practical application, the transparency principle faces multiple challenges, such as conflicts with trade secret protection, technical complexity, and ambiguous liability definition. Although the EU has adopted a series of specific provisions to ensure the implementation of the transparency principle, including requirements for information disclosure and documentation, these measures still need to further balance the interests of all parties during implementation to achieve the goal of promoting the healthy development of AI technology while protecting public rights and interests, social fairness, and justice.

References

Li XS, Li TK, 2025, On the Legal Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Systems—Taking the EU Artificial Intelligence Act as an Example. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 41(1): 86–102.

Han R, 2025, Copyright Challenges and Responses in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence—With Reference to EU Legislation. Journal of Zhaoqing University, 46(2): 45–53.

He ZH, 2025, The Product Safety Approach to Artificial Intelligence Legislation—A Critical Interpretation of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. SJTU Law Review, 2025(1): 153–164.

Lu CY, 2025, EU Artificial Intelligence Strategy and Prospects for China-EU Cooperation in Artificial Intelligence Governance. Contemporary World, 2025(5): 31–36.

Liao XJ, Shi LD, 2025, Analysis of National Security Risks of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act from the Perspective of Externality. Science and Technology Management Research, 45(1): 238–245.

Du J, 2025, Innovation of EU Citizens’ Digital Competence Framework in the Context of Artificial Intelligence and Its Enlightenment. Journal of Academic Library and Information Science, 43(2): 131–139.

Gao ZH, Zhang XZ, 2025, Analysis of Policy Tools, Path Characteristics and Influences of the EU’s Participation in Global Artificial Intelligence Governance. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2025(2): 150–160.

Zou J, Ji CY, 2025, The EU’s Approach to AI Risk Regulation and Its Enlightenment—Based on the Interpretation of the Artificial Intelligence Act. Journalism Research, 2025(1): 31–44 + 118.

Huang HY, Yang X, 2025, Interpretation of the EU Artificial Intelligence Regulatory System Based on the Artificial Intelligence Act. Library Development, 2025(1): 12–24.

Li KL, 2025, The Response and Effectiveness of the Artificial Intelligence Act to the Construction of EU Digital Sovereignty. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2025(2): 156–169.